The idea is interesting but not supported by our current understanding of solar mechanics. We would know if the sun were expanding at that rate - we can see the tiny expansion of an inch a year, so we would see 21 miles a year easily. And since there would be the same amount of energy being released over a larger area, the sun would become more red each year.
Unfortunately, global warming is caused in large part by human activities - trying to find a cosmic cause is simply refusing responsibility.New planet found in the constellation Perseus that has a dying, red giant star for a sun?blobal arming ????
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Report Abuse
New planet found in the constellation Perseus that has a dying, red giant star for a sun?First of all, the Sun is a yellow dwarf, not a red dwarf.Secondly, the progression of the diameter of a main sequence star from sun-sized to giant does not happen at a constant rate. The Sun will remain at approximately its same size and brightness for the next one and a half billion years, perhaps increasing some twenty percent.
At that time, the hydrogen in the center of the Sun will be exhausted, and helium "ash" will begin to accumulate in its center. This will go on for another four billion years, with the Sun increasing to three times its size and brightness.
Within a few hundred million more years, the processes inside the Sun will change again, and the Sun will make a rapid growth and increase in brightness to four hundred times its diameter and 1500 times its brightness within maybe thirty million years of that.
The Sun is not now expanding or getting brighter by any measurable amount, so it can safely be stated that the aging of our home star is not affecting this unproven thing called "global warming".
No comments:
Post a Comment